Meagan Holman, MPS District 8 board member response to Schneider letter about olives Dover St. School/Hive project

Trying to provide some clarity on the status of the Dover facility…

Dear Neighbors,

Thank you for your patience as we navigate the MPS District Policies and Procedures, which include allowing the MPS Administration to respond first to community concerns. I’ve learned that they responded on January 30, 2012, and I hope that response provided some useful information.

As you may already know, this matter has not yet been introduced to the Board for consideration. It is my understanding that the Administration has been in communication with representatives from The Hive as well as with other interested parties, and may or may not bring forward a recommendation regarding the Dover facility.

If such a proposal were to be recommended to the Board, it would first be considered at a Committee on Accountability, Finance, and Personnel meeting, where public hearing would be taken. Then, if recommended by that Committee, it would be considered by the full Board, where a majority of the Board members would have to approve the proposal before any action could occur.

Right now, it is my understanding that The Hive organization (Ms. Krawcyzk) and the MPS Office of Facilities & Maintenance Services (Ms. Gina Spang) are working on a proposal that they hope to bring to the Board, for a sale or for a lease, under terms that have yet to be negotiated. Let me be clear: It’s premature and inflammatory to suggest this is a done deal, for any specific amount, by any certain date. It’s simply not true.

Now is the perfect point in the process to reach out to The Hive and the MPS Office of Facilities & Maintenance Services directly to address your concerns. I personally believe that many of the concerns raised can be addressed quicker and more to your satisfaction by direct communication with The Hive. Help them shape a proposal for MPS that you can get excited about, as so many members of our community already have. While I can play a role in that communication, I am limited by our Board rules. Neither the Board, nor any individual Director, are involved with the day-to-day negotiations with any private, nonprofit organization.

I have been told that the staff and leaders at St Lucas School and Church are in regular communication with Ms. Krawczyk and the leaders at The Hive. MPS is as well. I hope you will reach out to them today.

I will continue to share concerns that are sent to me, but be advised that if initiated through the Board or a Board member, they will have to go through the same process as your earlier communication — to our constituent ombudsperson, Ms. Melli Wickliff, who will then send it to the appropriate District administrator, who will have seven business days to respond to you, etc.

Please also be aware that you may request a public hearing before the Board’s Committee on Parent and Community Engagement through a correspondence directly with our Board Clerk, Ms. Lynne Sobczak. I would be happy to forward contact information for any of the parties named in this correspondence.

Thank you for your continued interest in Milwaukee Public Schools and our community.

Sincerely,

Meagan Holman

—
Meagan W. Holman
Milwaukee Board of School Directors, District 8

email | holmanmw@milwaukee.k12.wi.us
mobile | 414.614.1720
twitter | @meagan4mps

 

Neighbors concerned about Hive proposed for Dover building

Dear Meagan Holman, District 8 Milwaukee Public Schools Board Director:

As taxpayers who have observed MPS invest tens of thousands of dollars in recent years into the building’s brickwork, paint job, and new windows, we all wonder about the deal being proposed to sell the vacant Dover Street School building to the “Hive at Dover,” led by a pair of art teachers who hope to form a nonprofit and then rent the space for a multitude of different purposes.

On Jan. 17, I and 19 other of your constituents who own homes on this same block of Dover Street presented a petition to ask that you answer a list of our common concerns regarding the impact on our property values. You have thus far ignored our request to answer about the terms of sale that affect us all.

It is rather curious that instead of attempting to sell the property to a viable existing nonprofit or developer, MPS is hand-picking a personal friend to purchase it at the price of $1. Have you sought out other nonprofits with a proven track record and offered the Dover Street School to them? The sale of this prime parcel could easily generate over $2 million that could be used to pay art teachers in Bay View MPS schools. At a time when MPS is incredibly strapped for cash, a “FOR SALE” sign has never been on the lawn.

Few of our neighbors were able to attend either of the two presentations put on by the “Hive” investors, but I made it to both. What I heard at the first session was that the “Hive” would be a place where some art programs would be available for children in the neighborhood, but the majority of the building’s use would shift toward adult entertainment. Included would be a concert series in the third-floor “gymnatorium” and studio space for artists and bands. These rentals appear to be the primary funding sources for the operation. The presenters would not commit to the hours our neighbors would be exposed to artists coming and going, but it would be a far cry from the normal school day that we expected when purchasing our homes.

The second presentation, held at the Sugar Maple Tavern, produced more information that immediate neighbors would abhor. They revealed that despite the fact that children were to be educated there, alcohol would be served. They talked of Gallery Nights and artist events where wine would flow freely. This does not seem appropriate for a “children’s art center” nor the residential neighborhood at large. Nor does it seem like a good thing for the “Hive” to have a retail thrift store in the building.

Another disturbing revelation at the second presentation was that of a maintenance budget—or lack thereof. The “Hive” proposes to use $40,000 to for both utilities and maintenance annually. Putting heat and electric back on for people in the building would easily eat up most or all of their $40,000 annual budget: $0 left to maintain the 123-year-old structure. They “hope” that someone retired from an MPS school might just volunteer their time to operate and maintain the boiler system. Given that Dover Street School had two full-time custodians and all of the shared resources of MPS, this seems like a plan destined to fail. Furthermore, they claim that it will be run on a 100-percent volunteer basis—with no persons paid to oversee the tenants’ activities.

Also of concern to the neighbors of Dover Street is the impact the “Hive” would have on our parking situation and our kids’ enjoyment of the playground. Currently, dozens of cars from the neighboring St. Lucas Church and Choice School are taken off the street and parked on the playground, which is currently the property of the taxpayers.  What would happen with that parking and playground once the property is given away for $1?

We also doubt that they understand the surrounding resources already available in Bay View. Within a six-block radius, all of the things they propose already exist. For parents looking for arts programs for their kids, there is the Beulah Brinton Center. For concerts, we have both the Humboldt Park Bandshell and the Dietrich Auditorium in Bay View High School. For artists and bands who wish to rent studio space, there is the Hide House. The Hide House and the Brinton Center are both located near railroad tracks—not in the midst of an old and quiet residential neighborhood.

At a time when MPS maintains 17 other vacant school buildings, why the push to give Dover Street School away for $1? The well-intentioned artists who would be given this sweetheart deal seem ill-prepared to maintain the property nor the neighbors’ quiet enjoyment. Worse yet, should they fail at this business venture, whom might they sell it to—and what might they do to the neighborhood?  Would they keep the profits of the sale or would it come back to us taxpayers?

I and my surrounding neighbors want concrete answers from MPS and a say regarding the future of the building. We felt it to be a shocking disappointment that you failed to attend the second “Hive” presentation and have yet to respond our petition for answers.

Sincerely,
Bob Schneider
Dover Street homeowner

Editor’s Note: This letter has been edited for space. Most, but not all of the neighborhood list of concerns are addressed in this open letter. Schneider also provided 20 signatures from 14 Dover Street households asking that Holman or MPS respond to the list of questions about the Hive at Dover proposal. At press time no definitive timeline was available regarding the potential sale of the Dover Street School building to the yet-to-be-formed nonprofit Hive at Dover, whose directors are Kellie Krawczyk and Kristina Snapp.

Tracking trends of the city’s poorest

Milwaukee’s poverty rate has continued to climb dramatically, but the Bay View area has been mostly spared from having the most severe pockets of poor.

Being the hyper-segregated city that we are, it should come as no surprise that the north side of the city has the most intense concentrations of poverty. According to the Brookings Institute October report The Re-emergence of Concentrated Poverty in the 2000s, only six of 45 census tracts in the city that are considered plagued with “extreme poverty” are on the south side or near south side. None are in Bay View, but some are close. Brookings views extreme poverty where more than 40 percent of the people live below the poverty level. The poverty threshold is considered $22,314 a year for a family of four.

East of the freeway, the Bay View area has poverty levels generally from 10 to 20 percent. Areas along the lake hover around 10 percent while about 20 percent of the residents further west to the freeway are considered poor. However, west of the freeway levels immediately hit 30 percent, and in the case of some census tracts just west of that, 40 percent.

In all, Brookings estimates 43,610 poor people in Milwaukee live in extreme poverty while 90,044 people live in census tracts with extreme poverty. Milwaukee’s overall poverty rate was 29.5 percent in 2010, according to recently released figures from the Census Bureau, with 171,521 living below the poverty line. The city ranks ninth among U.S. cities in the level of poverty and 21st overall in the number of people living in extreme poverty. The city’s poverty rate was 27 percent in 2009.

The Bay View area is somewhat of a hodgepodge when it comes to extreme poverty growth rates. The far southeast corner of Bay View saw a 5- to 10-percent increase in the number of poor people from 2000 to 2005-09, while areas close to Jones Island saw a decrease of 10 percent. Most of the area, however, remained stable.

The highest increases—more than 10 percent—occurred on the north side of the city and in the cities of Waukesha and Wauwatosa, which are relatively new to the poverty game.

The Census Bureau reports statewide poverty at about 13.2 percent compared with 12.4 percent in 2009.

A disproportionate number of minorities are still poor. About 41.4 percent of the city’s black residents and 32.3 percent of Hispanics were poor, according to census data.

The Brookings report found that 10.5 percent of poor Americans live in areas with extreme poverty—up a third nationwide since 2000 and doubling in the Midwest—but lower than the record 14 percent in 1990.

“These trends suggest the strong economy of the late 1990s did not permanently resolve the challenge of concentrated poverty,” the report stated.

The think-tank’s solution wasn’t terribly enlightening, however. “Policies that foster balanced and sustainable economic growth at the regional level, and that forge connections between growing clusters of low-income neighborhoods and regional economic opportunity, will be key to longer-term progress against concentrated disadvantage.”

doughissom@bayviewcompass.com

Uncertainty for taverns over concealed firearms

doughissom@bayviewcompass.com

With the state allowing people to carry concealed weapons effective Nov. 1, some tavern owners and other businesses are still confused as to what exactly their options are if they want to keep patrons from bringing guns into their establishments.

The Milwaukee Common Council passed a resolution urging bars to ban guns, but as of mid-October, offered no signs for bars to post that would inform customers of the new rule, nor any guidance for handling gun-toters in their establishments.

Governor Scott Walker signed the bill legalizing concealed carry in July, but with the start date looming, questions were still unanswered. As of the end of September the state Department of Justice hadn’t even decided how to implement training programs so people can get a permit.

Some bar owners wondered what their authority was in keeping guns off their premises.

“The police told me they didn’t know how they were going to enforce any sort of ban I’d want in my business,” one tavern owner told me.

State law does say that if gun holders have a gun at a bar they are not allowed to drink alcohol. The gun holder is not supposed to be intoxicated, either. It’s a misdemeanor if a person is drunk with a gun.

Jason Wedesky, president of the Kinnickinnic Avenue Business Improvement District, said the topic hasn’t been brought up at any BID meetings so far. The BID has not offered any advice to its members either, he said.

According to state law, signs outlawing guns on private property must be posted conspicuously at public entrances and be at least five-by-seven inches. Signs can be found from online stores for about $30, but some artwork can be printed for free.

The city of Milwaukee has banned concealed weapons in all city-owned buildings. Milwaukee County has banned weapons in county buildings as well. The law doesn’t allow bans in places such as the zoo or other public outdoor spaces like parks. In October Milwaukee County proposed to ban weapons on board its buses.

Tavern owners are pretty much unanimous in their desire to ban concealed weapons because of the common sense logic that alcohol and firearms are a deadly combination.

Of course, there has always been the possibility that a bar patron was packing heat, but the new law implies they should now feel comfortable in doing so.

Bar owners have a tougher enforcement issue than other businesses, given that patrons could be intoxicated and volatile if asked to leave their weapon outside. State law does say that if gun holders have a gun at a bar they are not allowed to drink alcohol. The gun holder is not supposed to be intoxicated, either. It’s a misdemeanor if a person is drunk with a gun. Otherwise it’s a trespassing charge with up to a $1,000 fine if a business owner calls police when a person is carrying a gun into a business that has banned them.

But it’s a sticky situation for any bartender to be sure.

“Enforcement is difficult. Any sense that a patron is trespassing with a gun, or, if permitted to carry on premises, takes a drink, justifies a call to police,” according to advice from the Milwaukee Department of Public Works according to 14th District Alderman Tony Zielinski.

“There’s none greater danger than the potential and reality of the mixture of alcohol and guns,” Milwaukee Alderwoman Milele Coggs told the Common Council. Coggs authored the resolution urging taverns to ban guns, which passed Sept. 20 with one abstention and one opposed.

Alderman Bob Donovan said he abstained because he didn’t want to send a message to tavern owners that not posting no-gun signs would come back to “haunt” them when their licenses are up for renewal. Alderman Joe Dudzik voted against the tavern resolution and against banning guns from city buildings. He said if the law allows people to carry guns, they should be allowed to carry guns. The overriding issue for him is self-protection.

The Tavern League of Wisconsin hasn’t sent out advice to its members on how barkeeps should handle concealed carry, unlike when the state banned smoking in taverns two years ago. The Tavern League website still has links dealing with the smoking ban but lists nothing for concealed carry issues. That’s likely reflective of the spilt on the issue when it comes to pro-gun and anti-gun opinions. 

Hissom tends bar at Rocco’s in Bay View.

Dangerous precedent of Rosendale Dairy must inspire citizen activism across state

EDITORIAL

In March of this year, the largest confined animal feeding operation (CAFO) in the state of Wisconsin was given permission from the Department of Natural Resources to grow even larger. In fact, DNR removed any limit on the maximum number of animal units from the permit.

Rosendale Dairy, about 20 miles northwest of Fond du Lac, is now allowed to increase the size of their herd without notifying the public or the DNR. This huge industrial facility, which began construction in 2008, houses over 8,000 head of cattle and draws nearly 90 million gallons of water per year from four high-capacity wells. The operation releases hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and methane—toxic air emissions that can threaten the health of the community.

The dairy’s livestock generates nearly 100 million gallons of manure per year. Only the cities of Madison and Milwaukee produce more biological waste. Unlike municipal sludge which is processed through a treatment plant, this toxic blend of manure, silage leachate, and pharmaceuticals is stored untreated in pits until being spread on fields directly adjacent to wetlands, streams, and major watersheds. Monitoring these uncovered pits for overflow or leakage is done by self-inspection and self-reporting.

In January of 2009, DNR held a public hearing on the WPDES permit (document allowing pollutant discharge) and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Citizens and conservation groups submitted extensive written comments on the grave health risks to our air and drinking water, urging that a wastewater treatment plant be required. Despite the overwhelming response, DNR issued the WPDES permit effective March 2009. With legal help from Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA), eight members of People Empowered Protect the Land (PEPL) of Rosendale, a local grassroots group, filed a petition with DNR for a review of the permit.

Communications among the dairy, DNR, and PEPL followed. We made public the many flaws in Rosendale Dairy’s permit. With strong support from MEA, we moved through the legal process, achieving significant improvement in the dairy’s waste spreading plan. We exposed the multitude of drain tiles located in fields to be used for spreading—direct conduits to groundwater—which Rosendale Dairy preferred to keep undisclosed. With significant gains having been made and with limited finances, PEPL withdrew from the contested case hearing this past August. We will continue to watch, monitor, and record. We are beyond intimidation.

Meanwhile, toxic manure threatens to spread across our rural communities. High-capacity wells are drying up trout streams and lakes in central Wisconsin. Private wells around the state have been contaminated by manure pollution from factory farms. Despite this assault on land and people, DNR continues permitting more industrial livestock facilities. Without responsible action from ordinary citizens, we can anticipate further easing of environmental regulations and greater devastation to our natural resources. PEPL and many other groups and individuals are rising up against an unsustainable system. We are aware of the limits of the land and the Earth’s finite resources.

While permits to discharge millions of gallons of untreated waste should require mandatory round-the-clock monitoring by DNR, these growing industrial operations are largely self-regulated. Weekly flyovers to videotape the vast uncovered manure pits should be required. Air emissions equipment should be installed to measure the volatile compounds invading our breathing space and enforce compliance with the Clean Air Act. Sadly, justice for the land is under attack and needs our help.

The people of Wisconsin are rich in persistence and passion. We must be the teachers and urge our legislators to write laws that acknowledge that water is finite, that the people may not be robbed of their natural resources. We are not going away.

Elaine Swanson lives in Pickett, Wis. and is a member of People Empowered Protect the Land (PEPL) of Rosendale. To see an aerial view of Rosendale Dairy’s waste storage facilities:

http://tinyurl.com/3o3mq6b

Letter to Alderman Zielinski about dangerous intersection at Smith and Howell due to construction on Lincoln

Hello Mr. Zielinski,

I live in the upper unit on the corner of Smith & Howell Ave. across from the Citgo. I used to own the shop downstairs. We met a few times at neighborhood business association meetings.

I am writing about the one way street closure due to the construction on Lincoln Ave. The way the city has chosen to close the street is very dangerous. Cars heading south on Howell don’t realize that they are nearly invisible to cars going west on Smith. It looks like the entire street is closed from that angle so when you move forward and someone is coming full speed it is very dangerous. Many cars have screeched to a halt; honking horns are much more common and it is flat out scary. There is a lot of smashed car debris on the side of the road in front of the gas station that makes me think there have been a number of fender benders I haven’t been home [to witness].

Tonight at 8:08pm there was a hit & run (the car who was side-swiped chased the car that hit them and then sped away). This is the second accident in a week I witnessed that wasn’t reported to the police. I have seen/heard over half a dozen accidents in the past five years (who knows how many I haven’t been home for).

PLEASE quickly pass this information along to someone who can do something and rethink how this closure is being dealt with at this intersection before someone gets really hurt.

Perhaps a good solution would be to have a very visible stop sign for traffic heading south on Howell coming from Lincoln.

Thanks for your time,

Faythe Levine
Bay View

P.S. As I was typing this a long horn blast was heard from the street below; it’s endless.

The Hissom Report —Sign wars are on

Fourteenth District Alderman Tony Zielinski has always led his fellow pols in that strategic campaign strategy known as the yard sign. The orange sign with the black Z—“the mark of Zielinski” as it’s been called—pops up in his district every fall, taking the place of day lilies that have spent the summer brightening the streetscape.

But for this campaign Zielinski has added electricity to his signage arsenal. Appearing suddenly at 2710 S. Howell Ave. in recent weeks was a lighted version of his yard sign in the former location of the Bay View Barber. It’s hard to miss. But according to Zielinski, it’s not his new HQ, just the property of an enthusiastic supporter.

For those looking for signs from the incumbent’s opponent, Jan Pierce, his can be found with green lettering on a white background, with a green-colored “Pierce” as the prominent feature. The Highbury Pub on KK sports the most Pierce signage I’ve noticed so far.

Coast Guard Stays Docked in Bay View

The Bay View Coast Guard station is re-upping its lease with the city of Milwaukee for another year with an annual renewal provision through 2037. The station sits on 7.4 acres at 2420 S. Lincoln Memorial Dr., and will get an additional 0.34 acres for cutter mooring. It also must install more attractive fencing as part of the deal.

As long as it stays, the Coast Guard pays rent of just $1 a year. But one caveat to the arrangement is that if the Coast Guard moves its command post out of the Bay View building it then will have to pay the city $13,000 an acre for the remaining years of the contract.

Covering Sick with Insurance

Insurers couldn’t deny health coverage to people with medical conditions, or drop them if they get sick, under state legislation introduced by Representative Jon Richards, who represents the northern part of Bay View.

The bill also would prohibit insurance companies from having annual or lifetime caps on benefits or charging co-pays or deductibles for preventive care. It would also require insurance companies to cover emergency room services in and out of their networks without additional cost-sharing requirements.

Richards picked up Senator Jon Erpenbach as a cosponsor. But given the GOP vice grip on all things lawmaking, the so-called Wisconsin Patients’ Bill of Rights is not likely going to pass.

Treasurer’s Race Is On

Most won’t recognize the name Wayne Whittow, but his isn’t a bad-paying gig—$141,815 plus benefits. Whittow is retiring from his post as city treasurer after 35 years overseeing the city’s intake of tax revenues and fees. Longtime local political activist Rick Kisséll has tossed his hat into the ring to succeed Whittow—for the fourth time.

Kisséll, a professional Spanish interpreter for over 20 years and union activist, last lost to Whittow in 2008. Kisséll wants to talk about computerized efficiencies for the office.

Correction
The maximum individual contribution per aldermanic candidate for the 14th District is $382, not $385 as erroneously stated in last month’s column.

City chickens pro and con

City chickens are a step backwards

Dear Editor,

Growing up in Bay View, a section called Little Italy, almost everyone had chickens in their backyard.

The eggs were fresh and the chickens were eventually butchered and eaten.

But chickens bred rats and the smell of their feces wafted through the area so eventually the city passed an ordinance that wouldn’t allow chickens in the city anymore.

So, why now?

Chickens not only smell, breed unwanted rodents, but also squawk constantly.

If you really feel the need to get back to your organic roots, move to the country!

Leave the chickens out of the city!

Mary Lynn Ceretto Rupp — Bay View

Dear Mary,

I think the key words in your complaints are “almost everyone had chickens” and “eventually butchered.”

Stop and think for a moment; do you really believe “almost everyone” in modern Bay View is going to be raising chickens?

And, eventually butchering them?

Yeah, I don’t think so either.

Please try showing a little tolerance and let the people around you try something new/different.

If it truly becomes a nuisance, you can be the first one to ask the city to shut down your neighbor’s coop.

Craig Sween — Fernwood Neighborhood, Bay View

These letters were originally comments posted at bayviewcompass.com.

THE HISSOM REPORT: 14th District war chest contest

Amassing a campaign fund of some $10,000 eight months before the election used to be considered a sign of a strong contender in Milwaukee aldermanic races. But in the case of Bay View attorney Jan Pierce, who’s running against incumbent Alderman Tony Zielinski in the 14th District, his $10,000 pales to Zielinski’s $127,000.

The two recently filed their reports on how much they’ve collected and spent since the beginning of the year. Pierce reports bringing in $10,526 and spending $5,871.86 during that time. Zielinski reports his team has $127,224.48 cash on hand and has spent $21,102.03 for this year.

The size of Zielinski’s stake stems from his brief flirtation last year with a run for lieutenant governor. At the end of 2010 he reported to the city he had $136,676.51 in campaign money. At the end of 2009 he reported to the state he had $130,575.17 in campaign money for that year.

Pierce argues Zielinski shouldn’t be able to use his lieutenant-governor campaign funds and at the least should have to give some back because state limits are higher than city limits, in terms of accepting money from individuals. The city allows $385 in individual contributions, but state limits allow up to $10,000 per person for campaigns for the top offices of governor and lieutenant governor.

Zielinski said he is allowed to use his state campaign fund on his local campaigns as long as the individual donation doesn’t go over the $385 limit, which covers the four-year aldermanic term. Using that formula, a $10,000 donation could be used to fund 25.97 campaigns during a hundred-year period ($10,000/$385 per four-year term). That means that contributors—such as Julie Graves Moy, PhD, of Austin, Texas, who gave him $10,000 during his lieutenant-governor campaign—will instead be giving him $385 for an aldermanic campaign, for an office they may care nothing about. And Zielinski doesn’t have to ask permission from the donor.

On the other hand, the late Jose Garza, who owned Conejito’s restaurant in Milwaukee, gave $3,000 for Zielinski’s state campaign. Garza would certainly have had an interest in Zielinski’s aldermanic campaign.

“That’s why I have a CPA do my reports,” Zielinski said about the active accounting between the two reports. He said he thinks he’ll have about $100,000 available for his aldermanic campaign, after all the sorting of donors’ money is complete.

City election commission executive director Sue Edman agrees, in part. She said she had to get advice from the state General Accountability Board on the matter.

The city has crossed this road at least twice before with current Mayor Tom Barrett. He was able to transfer his congressional campaign money to use in his first run for mayor, transfer it again in a run for governor and now can transfer his recent statewide campaign’s cash back to run for mayor.

Barrett’s recent report showed his camp raised $457,911.76 this year and has $371,599.02 cash on hand.

By virtue of Zielinski having a seat on the city’s Licenses Committee, he attracts contributions from all over the city and beyond, since tavern owners and just about anyone needing a license for anything in the city have to be heard by the committee. Tavern and convenience store operators are known for their proclivity to donate to aldermen since their livelihood depends on keeping their license to sell booze.

Zielinski’s report this year notes some prominent tavern operators chipping in the maximum contribution, including Silk night club owner Teresa Shemitis; Darlene Fix, wife of Bay View Brew Haus owner Matthew Fix; and Michael Bousis and his wife Verna, who are opening a Cermak Fresh Produce store near Miller Park. Jadranka Blagojevic also gave the max and lists her occupation as housewife, although she used to run the now-shuttered Big Dog’s House of Blues, 3062 S. 13th St.

Brian Ganos and his wife Gienna each gave Zielinski $375. Ganos owns Sonag Ready Mix, which has a major presence in Bay View on Chase Avenue.

Pierce’s donors are a mix of local attorneys and some progressive Democrats, such as Stacie Rosenzweig, wife of County Supervisor Jason Haas, and former school board member Jennifer Morales. One tavern owner on Pierce’s list, Holly DeShaw, who co-owns Blackbird Bar, 3007 S. Kinnickinnic Ave., gave him $100. Zielinski has opposed Blackbird’s getting a patio for the bar.

While Pierce filed his reports electronically with the city, Zielinski has not. Only two city officials—Mayor Tom Barrett and school board member Peter Blewett—file online, a feature that’s been offered for over five years.
doughissom@bayviewcompass.com

Lulu’s now supports proposed adult day care

On Aug. 5, “Lulu Café & Bar” posted the following comment at the Bay View Compass Facebook page.

We’d like to apologize to everyone who was hurt or offended by the comments in our letter to the zoning committee [quoted in “Firestorm over proposed adult day care center overblown?” August 2011 Bay View Compass].

The informational meeting regarding the rezoning of the building for the proposed adult day care center Wednesday evening [Aug. 3] was quite helpful to our understanding what this particular company is proposing. It sounded to us that, if it is well-run and maintained, it could be a good asset to the neighborhood. That is our ultimate concern and something we’ve worked hard to contribute to for the last 10 years.

We’re glad that communication was opened up with the operator and we were able to get the correct and full story on which to base our current position of support for this type of center to open nearby in Bay View.

Lulu Café & Bar

Victory Garden management held up irrigation system

Dear Editor,

I was appalled to see a statement made by the executive director of Victory Garden Initiative, Gretchen Mead, regarding the water collection system at the Bay View Hide House Garden (“Rooftop rainwater collection system update” August 2011 Bay View Compass).

I have never heard of a paid director who talked badly about volunteers who created and were ready to execute a project. I was shocked to see that she blamed volunteers for the delay when in fact they were waiting for VGI, who handles the Hide House Garden’s funds, to release the plot renters’ money to execute the project. The garden has had ample funding for the project, which was all set to go when the Compass covered the project in May (bayviewcompass.com/archives/7098).

It’s a shame that an organization that prides itself on volunteer participation would then blame those same volunteers for the organization’s mismanagement. The current installation of this water system in August was executed by the same hardworking Bay View volunteers who she feared were not going to be able to get it “done very well.”

Thanks,

Melissa Tashjian

Volunteer organizer,

Bay View Hide House Community Gardens

Disturbed by local business reaction to proposed adult day care

Dear Editor,

I was very surprised to read about three local business owners’ reaction to a potential adult day care in our community (“Firestorm over proposed adult day care center overblown?” August 2011 Bay View Compass).

We all have family members and loved ones who have lived with disabilities and dementia. These individuals have suffered from discrimination and stigma. My grandmother and both of my in-laws suffered from Alzheimer’s before their deaths. Two benefited from community services; one suffered much earlier when institutionalization was the only option. Community-based programs and increased integration into the community have decreased ignorance and promoted independence and dignity for these individuals, as well as support and resources for their families.

What I find most disturbing is that the owners of Lulu, Tonic, and Baby Boomers Bar see no difference between supervised adult day services and vagrancy, decrease in property values, “public drunkenness and urination and panhandling.” This shows that they do not want to see people with disabilities, or services for them, in their neighborhoods. No correlation is seen between organized services and a solution to vagrancy. They appear to be ignorant of the fact that vacant buildings also contribute to crime and decreased property value.

I have worked in community-based residential facilities for people with developmental disabilities and mental health diagnoses in multiple stable residential neighborhoods in the suburbs, including one in West Allis which obtained community approval for licensure since there were several other facilities already in place. These services are an asset to community members.

As for the owners of these three businesses, they have evidently forgotten that not all people with disabilities or mental health issues are “urinating in their parking lot” and loitering in front of their stores. Nor are they self-conscious regarding their outspoken ignorance. I will not be patronizing these businesses again (actually, I had never heard of Baby Boomers Bar).

Susan Thaller

Bay View

Next Page »